u Latin apocalypsis (revelation), itself borrowed from the ancient Greek apokalupsis (discovered), coming from the Greek verb kalupto (to hide) preceded by the prefix of deprivation apo. Literally "un-hidden", and therefore by extrapolation, "exposed to the eyes", "removal of the veil", "the veil is lifted".
Since the translation of the clay tablets of Mesopotamia and the study of biblical writings, it is shown that several episodes of the Old Testament are echoed in tablets written in cuneiform characters. Such as the biblical flood that is modeled on the Babylonian version of the flood found in the library of the Assyrian king Assurbanipal in Nineveh translated and published by Goerges Smith, or contained in the Epic of Gilgame (Babylonian version dated eighteenth or seventeenth century BC), the creation of the world (epic Enuma Elish), the creation of humanity with clay, the secret of immortality ...
Copy of a Sumerian tablet, about 2500 av. JC
It is in this continuity that the Sumer tablets will be displayed by offering a fresh look at the first chapters of Genesis. There have been many attempts at translations, but the most relevant of all has been the researcher in sclerology, Anton Parks. In his book entitled EDEN (2011, Editions Nouvelle Terre), while relying on the work of his predecessors (Samuel Noah Kramer, Jean Bottero, Georges Contenau, ...), he offers us a translation and draws up a comparison table with what we find in the Jerusalem Bible.
Annotated tablets CBS 14005, CBS 8383 are dated to the first kings of Sumer, at least to 2800 years BC. J. - C. and BM 74329 whose reproduction of this text existed in Babylon during the captivity of the Hebrews, at least to 597 BC. They are the property of the British Museum.
CBS 14005, in front of, line 21: "Enlil and the Gods have produced the humankind...they were naked: no clothes had been planned for them "
Gn 2: 25: " the man and the woman are created by God are nus »
CBS 14005, side b, line 24: "We, the Godswe changed it, we have it wrought... and he said to stand in the clay »
Gn 2: 7: " God modeled the man with the clay soil and man became a living being »
CBS 14005, side b, line 21: " The herds from the enclosure ...the man foreigners named and counted them a lot "
Gn 2: 20: " The man give some The first name and to all the cattle, the birds of the sky and all the wild beasts "
CBS 14005, side b, line 29: "They were two. At any place, the man made noise. His wife performed his high service picking rations. Alas, she accompanied him »
Gn 2: 25 and 3: 6: " The man and the woman are two. The woman accompanies the man in the garden. The woman is going gather the forbidden fruit "... (EDEN, p.143)
CBS 8383-a, column 2: "At that time, the man did not produce anything ».
Gn 2: 5: "... There is no had no man to cultivate the ground "(EDEN, p.110)
BM 74329: " 7 generations de divinities, 7 creation cycles before the coming of the god An (u) and its Anunna »
Gn 1: 1 to 2: 3: "the 7 days of creation with Elohim before the coming of YHW and Angels (EDEN, 65)
The goal here is not to present all the similarities but just to highlight the fact that several millennia before the beginning of the writing of the Old Testament and the New Testament, a story quite similar to that of Genesis already existed and was even transcribed on clay tablets. Some might say that this is not surprising since the word of God is manifold in its manifestation and therefore we would there, the first stammers of what would become the Bible later. So that basically "God" wanting to centralize the biblical knowledge to propagate it more easily would have decided through "inspired" men to transmit his word again in condensed form. To those, we could answer, yes why not.
Unfortunately, the equation is not so simple, indeed, those who have been attentive have found that where the Bible speaks of "God", the Sumerians refer to gods, as it is customary to present what comes from the past as marked with the seal of ignorance, one might conclude that the Sumerians have been wary of the description of the divine. Yet this plural exists where many do not suspect it, in the Hebrew version of the Old Testament.
There are 14 main French Bible readings, 12 agree for use of the term "God" while 2 others (translation by Dhorme and Chouraqui) make the name used in the Hebrew texts "Elohim". Gold Elohim is not God for 3 reasons.
1 - The word "God" comes from the Latin Deus, itself derived from the Indo-European root dei "shine" used to designate the bright sky, the sunlight. Its sacred meaning only appears when it is associated with the Greek deity Zeus pronouncing ZE-OUS and whose genitive is Dios. It will appear in the French language in the nineteenth century. He is therefore a bastard at the linguistic level.
2 - Elohim is a plural, indeed in Hebrew the particle "im" is the plural mark. Elohim is the plural of Eloha that is simplified by EL.
What does the Larousse Dictionary (1965 edition) tell us: "Elohim, Hebrew (...) plural of El or Eloha ..." And the Larousse Online Dictionary 2012:
"Elohim: Plural of Eloha, which means 'God'".
It will be noted that the quotation marks of the word God in the second definition. A way of saying, to take with tweezers.
3 - Since it is admitted that it was in Hebrew that the corresponding section of the Old Testament of the Bible was written. It is important to take into account certain rules, indeed to translate from Hebrew, it is not to translate from English, even less when it comes to sacred texts dictated by God himself. The Tanakh which designates the Hebrew Bible is a consistent set, which according to the rule of Gematria gives each word the role of a key to solve an arithmetic equation.
What is gematria?
It is a rule that associates a numerical value with a letter, so that in Hebrew the gematric value of the word father is 3 and that of the mother word 41, the sum 44 corresponding to the value of the word son.
So to replace the word Elohim which is a plural with a singular word which moreover has no etymological relationship with the latter when one knows the gematria, is to bring a sense against a story that claims to be sacred yet.
It should be known that in Sumerian, ADAM means "Animals, animals", EDEN, "Back of the mountain", refers to a plain in which the ADAM were to work for the Sumerian gods.
Gn 2: 15 "And Jehovah God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to cultivate him and take care of him" (New World)
In the Bible man is also taken to work in the Garden of Eden, in fact he exists only because there was no one to cultivate the earth as this passage says:
Gn 2: 5 "... Jehovah God had not rained on the earth and there were no men to cultivate the soil" (New World)
Note that in Hebrew Eden means Garden, it is very particular to translate the Hebrew term Eden by Garden of Eden.
If we dwell on the etymology of the word paradise, which comes from the Latin paradise, from the Greek paradeisos which meant when borrowing Persian pardez "a closed park where are wild animals" and that there add to this the translations of certain biblical words echoing in Sumerian, we find the conception of Sumerian EDEN.
GÀN EDEN "The field of the back of the mountain", it is interesting to note that in Hebrew GAN EDEN means "garden of delights".
Another disturbing fact and not least the Bible tells us, through Gn 1: 27 "And God began to create man in his image, in the image of God he created him: male and female he created them" ( New World), that man and woman already existed before Gn 2: 7. While Adam is presented to us from the biblical point of view as the first man, Sumer again raises a veil:
BM 74329: "7 generations of deities, 7 creation cycles before the coming of the god An (u) and his Anunna"
As the translation of the tablet shows, the 7 biblical days among Sumerians correspond to a succession of generations, and at each cycle, something more was brought to the creation. For the Sumerians, it is An through his son Enlil who created the EDEN, but not the first men who were already populating the land upon his arrival. It is interesting to note that in the New World translation Jehovah's name appears for the first time after the 7th day. Coincidence of translators?
Anyway, given the elements presented, Biblical Genesis carries the smell of plagiarism (again), and also the most beautiful misinformation that can offer us the Bible with the substitution of the term Elohim, a plural, by a singular name whose representation God does not refer to the same dimension.
Why have not many people ever heard of this while the contents of the Sumerian tablets have been known for a while now?
Because at first, very few Christians took the trouble to take a look at the source documents of their Bible. The belief based on an act of faith that is in a way opposed to critical thinking and questioning, is not surprising in itself, it is very wrong to question part of the Bible and accept the rest since the entire Bible is presented as a block conveying the divine word. If we admit that a single line is false, we question the totality of the work. It is also on this point that the new Christian branches appeared in the 19th Century (Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, etc ...), they declare each as conveying the true Biblical message thus introducing their translation of the Bible and a teaching based on this new Bible. Of course, the members must find a coherence since the Bible is personalized, it is easy to pretend in front of the members to be right and the others wrong ...
It should be noted that the major archaeological research centers are financed by major Christian investors who do not intend to question the authenticity of their work, thus putting pressure on researchers who need subsidies. to walk in the direction that is imposed on them, it is very "Christian", this need for the control of information and knowledge, and in view of the contradictions and other sources highlighted, we understand why. In fact, this is how research always works, investors silence those who contradict their vision and give resonance to those who support their vision, in terms of history the latest case is that of the world. Pharaonic Egypt.
Indeed, since the first Napoleonic expeditions (1798) and the study of the testimonies of the Greek contemporaries, it is known from an elite that Pharaonic Egypt until the Ptolemaic dynasty is of Negro-African origin, At the present time we continue to see representations of Pharaohs or other pre-Ptolemic characters represented with Semitic features. It is easy to place oneself in the context of the time to understand the consequences of such truths. Imagine Napoleon and his fellow slavers discovering that the indexed race is the founding of civilization in which the first Greek scholars such as Pythagoras and others recognize having made their class? A truth to shut up. But the challenge of Egypt goes further than this simple historical conjecture.
Pharaonic Egypt symbolizes the crystallization of the Hebrew people in the Bible, who suffered terrible slavery was saved and guided to a promised land through the prophets of God, unfortunately again the Bible is questioned. Before even recently Egyptologists had the monopoly of the study of Egyptian sites, giving themselves to their heart's content they could conjecture all kinds of theories based in part on the Bible, these conjectures were out that it was the Hebrew people, slave of the Pharaohs, who had built the great Pyramids, to support their theories, they lacked a word, the term designating the caste of slaves, word that until today they could not find and that was not for lack of proposing it. In fact, the reality is quite different, since scientists of any field have been able to study the field, they are unanimous on one point, the great pyramids and some great monuments are of such technical prowess that if one wished them to redo with the same precision with today's materials, we would need the latest state-of-the-art tools in each field and that without guarantee of results. Clearly, it becomes very difficult to see in these monuments the work of men and women slaves, that would be to say to compare that the rockets of NASA are built by slaves. What would be absurd yet even today is the voice of the Egyptologists who continue to be heard.
All this why?
Through a number of things it becomes clear that there is information at two speeds, not to say three, at a time when liberal finance made money its primary form, that is to say that of information, the latter which has always been vital for any society wishing to continue, as the study shows, its cryptographic systems developed by different civilizations to safeguard and protect their information, has never been so accessible.
Today, the internet has exploded the information frontiers that so-called modern societies have long sought to maintain hermetic. It is possible to know places, places, people without ever moving, if we know how to handle this instrument that is internet we are able to drain the good information towards oneself. Thus ignorance is no longer the default choice of the individual, but a voluntary choice. Once we fought for his dignity, his land, now it is above all a war of information that tends to plunge those who will not know it to the abysses of our earthly existence.
The predation system in which the world has been plunged since 2 millennia has caused the disappearance of far too many peoples, far too much suffering to end today to a world ultra inegalitarian. It must stop and it is up to each of us to do it in our own way, I started with the Bible, because in my opinion Christianity since the Edict of Milan in 313, who proclaimed this great religion religion of the Roman Empire, propelled Europe into a period of ignorance and nameless conflicts, destroying in passing all the base of the ancient societies alive there, has through the papal bull of 1454 given the authorization to the king from Portugal, Alphonse V, permission to enslave Africa and the Americas causing the disappearance of tens of millions of people, then still at the time of colonization as European societies decided to distance themselves from the Church through several promulgated laws, it is at this moment that they decided at the Berlin conference which began in 1885, that it would be good to Christianize all sub-Saharan Africa thus destroying the whole pedestal of s African societies, already weakened by 13 Centuries of slavery and Arab-Muslim castration and 5 Centuries of Western slavery under Christian cover, thus plunging the continent into the state we know today, it is paradoxical to note that Black Africa has never been so bad as when the number of Christians on its soil has reached a historical maximum.
It is also time for this continent to accept to look at the reality, if the capitalist and predatory Europe made "gift" of the Bible to Black Africa it is certainly not to serve him or because she was convinced of the usefulness of this book, to be convinced of it, one can take a look at the speech of Leopold II, king of the Belgians of the colonial period. And it would be pretentious for black Africa to pretend to understand better than Europe the foundations of a book that was imposed on it by the murder, rape and submission of their grandparents.
The more time passes and the more the untruths on this continent are expressed and demonstrated, it is now up to this African to choose either to wait for a biblical salvation and thus to embrace the rules of the game of this system of predation, then to take up all his courage and to look with a critical eye its history, to dust off it to get rid of the conceptual chains with which it was put out of the race of time giving it the illusion of having always been behind in the race for civilization.
It is not a matter of simply getting rid of a heavy colonial heritage to lock oneself into a blind traditionalism, but also to reconsider our historical spiritual base, to restore its lost relevance, to leave mysticism to recover this Science that the ancestors were able to express with the constant desire to print the combination Truth-Justice-Order-Harmony crystallized in the Mâat.
Like the American Indians, during their genocide programmed by the American state, who never ceased to warn the one they called "the white man" on his attitude towards the environment, what the latter hardly seems to understand today, Africa has many things to remind the world.
About Kaptué Tokam
Anton Parks, "Eden", 2011, New Earth Editions Samuel Noah Kramer, "The Story Begins at Sumer", 1993, Flammarion
Cheikh Anta Diop, "Nations, Negroes and Culture", 1954, African Presence
Cheikh Anta Diop, "Civilization or Barbary", 2001, African Presence Assani Fassassi, "The sin of the Peah against Africa", 2004, Al Qalam
Roger Vigneron, "Elohim"
Jacques Grimault, "The Revelation of the Pyramids" New World, "The Holy Scriptures", Revised Edition of 1995, Watchtower Bible
Society of New York, Inc.
15 used from 0,52 €
|Number Of Pages||128|
Subscribe to our updates