Lhe time has come to reclaim our true history. It is not even a question of unearthing new discoveries, but of broadening the audience to the words of those who have been working seriously on these subjects for a long time already, despite the omerta on the subject. So what happened before the miraculous “appearance” of an evolved Egyptian civilization that archeology strives to date officially around 3000 BC? Where does this civilization come from, which we act as if it was born spontaneously? History as it is taught in schools says nothing on this subject and the dominant archaeological community maintains a consensus of silence on a subject that is in fact very disturbing. I therefore leave the floor to an exciting French researcher, Antoine Gigal.
By Antoine Gigal
For the pre-pharaonic past of Egypt we are faced with a very great enigma because there is always the questioning of knowing what exactly happened during the mysterious period before 3000 BC, the date of the appearance of the first so-called official pharaoh, Menes-Narmer.
This lapse of time where in a few decades, without warning, appear in a lightning fashion in their quite sudden perfection: writing, perfect pyramids, scholarly astronomy and everything that goes with a civilization of a very high sophistication, technicality and knowledge . It all seems to have happened without delay.
As the English Egyptologist Toby Wilkinson puts it so well: “It looks like they have no ancestors and no periods of development, they seem to have appeared overnight. "Our great Maspero (1846-1916) tells us more about the Egyptian texts:" Religion and the texts which make it known to us were already established before the first dynasty. It is up to us to put ourselves, in order to understand them, in the state of mind in which the people who built them were, more than seven thousand years ago. »(Review of the History of Religions, t. XIX, p.12). You read that correctly: “… before the first dynasty. "!
An incredible divine heritage
A little hard for it to go unnoticed and yet a sort of consensual omerta reigns on this subject in official circles preferring to consider this lineage as mythical; the subject is thus easier to evade. However, 160 fragments of this document were brought to Turin by the Italian Drovetti, French consul in Egypt in 1822. However, as luck would have it, we are missing certain corresponding fragments at the very beginning of the list. The ancient Egyptians saw their civilizations as an inheritance coming directly from divine beings who existed in Egypt thousands of years before the Pharaonic dynasties that we know of. The Turin papyrus, or more precisely the royal canon exhibited in the Egyptian museum in Turin, written in hieroglyphics and dating from Ramses II, presents the list of all the pharaohs who reigned over the land of Egypt. This list includes not only the historical pharaohs, but also “divine pharaohs from elsewhere” who reigned before the first dynasty of Menes. We are also told that this previous lineage would have reigned 13.420 years!
It is our brilliant Champollion who had measured in his time all the true importance of this document in order to be able to access a real dating. But fortunately the so-called Palermo stele also cites these so-called “mythical”, predynastic kings, going back thousands of years, mentioning until Horus himself who would have truly reigned on the land of Egypt.
Thoth would have reigned approximately from 8670 to 7100 BC “after the night of the battle” specifies Manetho. In writing his "Theogamy", a genealogy of the so-called celestial dynasties which would have reigned on Earth, the great Greek historian Hesiod (8th century BC), a very serious, moralizing historian, living in the time of Homer, had the Egyptian High Priests for main source of information. And the Egyptian High Priest Manetho (Ma-n-Thot) of Sebennnytos in the delta, Master of Secrets (3rd century BC) who had access to the library of Alexandria and who wrote for pharaoh a history of Egypt in Greek and in 30 volumes "Aegiptiaca", also cited these dynasties of predynastic divine origin.
What is curious but significant, moreover, is that Egyptologists still today use Manetho's dating, which is recognized as perfectly reliable for everything relating to dynasties recognized "officially", but they carefully avoid anything relating to dynasties. prehistoric at home, while they consider him as the "Father" of Egyptology! A very curious intellectual acrobatics to remain in the “political correctness”! Egyptology thus avoids talking too much about Manetho, despite his great usefulness and reliability, because for them some of the details he gives are extremely disturbing.
He wrote for example that according to the steles coming from the Gods of the first (true) dynasty, more than 20000 works were attributed to Thoth (Tehuti, Hermes). He also reported that these same Gods reigned from 33894 years to 23642 BC. It must be admitted that it is at least embarrassing on the part of the one from whom we hold all the proven true chronology of the official dynasties. How convenient it is to take certain elements and leave out others that don't fit into our thought patterns. Yet Champollion, he who had read a lot of original texts, moreover endowed with his flair and extraordinary genius, recognized the existence of at least 42 of these books of Thoth: "There are in all forty-two main books of 'Hermes (Thoth) including thirty-six in which is exposed all the philosophy of the Egyptians, and which are taught by high-class priests. (“Ancient Egypt”, Paris).
Manetho gives us very interesting details on the so-called “divine” dynasties which he divides into three kinds called “The Gods”, “The Heroes”, and the “Manes”. What is fascinating is that he argues that the category of “Gods” would be subdivided into 7 sections with at the head of each a “God”, among others Horus, Anubis, Thot, Ptah, Osiris, Ra…, and that "these Gods would originate from the Earth" then would then have become "celestial, astronomical by reaching the heavens". (You read correctly: “originating from the Earth”. There is undoubtedly a lot to discover in the underground realms of our planet.) Then come the “Heroes”, beings with supernatural terrestrial powers, and finally “The Manes” , glorious beings (also called "Khus") corresponding to the spirits of ancestors ruling elsewhere. It is moreover Osiris himself who says in the “Book of coming out to the light”: “The tunnels of the Earth gave birth to me”.
And according to Plutarch who wrote a very learned work on the worship given to Isis and Osiris: “Ra went to heaven and Osiris became pharaoh of Egypt with Isis and they built Thebes [the current Luxor]”. Finally, there are many predynastic genealogies cited by many serious researchers of the beginning of our era, such as that of Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea in Palestine or that of the most important Byzantine chronicler Syncellus, also residing in Palestine.
Unimaginable times of reign and yet ...
All of us therefore speak of a line of "gods" having reigned each several hundred years for a total of 23.200 years, then a list of "Shemsu-Hor", so-called "following of Horus" having ruled in total for 13400 years, then come the names of the "normal" pharaohs we know. The fact that divine and half-divine rulers have been able to reign for hundreds of years is unacceptable to our view, but we should ask ourselves why we accept the hundreds of years of life of the characters and prophets of the Bible as Enoch who lived more than 360 years, without flinching. Many factors that explain a much slower aging could be understood today thanks to the sciences: different terrestrial gravity, lower density or better protected or different DNA, other way of measuring the Time; the theses are multiple that can justify such lifetimes.
It was during the period (from 4000 BC) of the strange “Shemsu-Hor” – these so-called “companions of Horus” described wearing falcon or wolf masks, who are thought to be the initiators of the pharaonic dynasties ( but it is not quite so as we will see) – that suddenly appeared an unequaled degree of sophistication, a remarkable civilization in all its splendor. It is the researcher and philosopher Schwaller de Lubicz (1887-1961) who, as far as I know, generally “imposed” the translation “Shemsu-Hor” by “Followers of Horus” taken up by thousands of others since. He therefore meant by this a very advanced people who arrived in Egypt in prehistory, suddenly bringing all knowledge. It is moreover following this widely held belief that many authors immediately thought and wrote, like the prolific Sitchin (thinking that they were the Annunaki people having landed in Sumer first), that it was there the sudden arrival of beings from elsewhere, sort of ETs. However, it is not only false and much more complicated than that, but above all it is much more extraordinary.
The proven material traces: the ANU people
Let us first look at the work of a former French Egyptologist, Emile Amelineau (1850-1915) who devoted himself to the first dynasties and who excavated for the first time the tombs of pharaohs of the first (official) dynasty. Amélineau as and when his excavations in southern Egypt discovered evidence of the existence of a people already advanced before the pharaohs of the first dynasty. He discovered in particular the black people "the ANU" (sometimes called "aunu" - nothing to do with the Annunaki, it is not because there is the same sound of word in several languages that he designates the same thing. ), who ranched and farmed extensively all along the Nile and who shut themselves up inside the defensive city walls they built. We note that they had founded the cities of Esna (Anutseni), Erment (Anu Menti), Qush, Gebelein (Anti) and even Heliopolis (which was originally called "Anu"), because these cities all include in their written names the characteristic signs designating the Anu people, the three columns. And according to many researchers (Chandler, etc.), the greatest figures of ancient Egypt such as Osiris, Isis, Hermes, Horus come from this ancient Anu race. I remind you that according to the old texts, Osiris for example is said to be "Son of Geb and Nut, born in Thebes in Upper Egypt", thus giving him a historical reality of life (the texts themselves tell that he taught the arts of agriculture and installed just laws). For my part, I do not entirely agree with the thesis of an exclusive belonging to the Anu of these characters.
In any case, the Anu knew the use of metals, ivory, were very organized and knew how to write. This was proven by a number of artefacts from them found in the region of Abydos by Amélineau and described in his "Excavations of Abydos". The archaeologist specifies “If Osiris, although born in Thebes, was of Nubian origin [of the black race of Sudan], it would then be easy to understand why the struggle between Osiris and Seth took place in Nubia. ". (“Prolegomena” p.124/123). He also points out that Osiris seemed to have "an ethnic epithet designating his Nubian origin". Let's not forget that according to researchers, Anu is a term applied to Osiris himself and Amélineau quotes the passage from chapter XV of the so-called "Book of the Dead" (true translation of the title "Book of the Exit to the Light"): “O Thou God Anu in the mountainous land of Antem! O Great God of the double solar mountain! ". But it was the name of Osiris in his role as 4th Pharaoh on Earth that the Greeks translated as Onnuphris, ie "The Good". We have an extraordinary Anu predynastic document found this time by the great English Egyptologist Flinders Petrie (1853-1942) at Abydos. This is an inscribed tile unearthed under the dynastic temple. The inscription features the glazed earthenware portrait of Chief ANU Tera-neter. There is even his address inscribed above "Palais des ANU à Ermant, Tera-neter".
Existence of several groups
But the Anu are only a contribution to Egyptian civilization. There are others and this is what we are discovering more and more thanks to the latest archaeological finds in southern Egypt. We must also take into account the MESNITU (which some researchers equate with the Shemsu-Hor) who would come from Punt, more precisely for some from Somalia. Their Land would be called Ta Neteru (“The Land of the Gods”). They were mainly metallurgists and blacksmiths and would have ended up dominating the ANU and their Nubian land Ta Seti ("The Land of the Link" or "Land of the Prow" according to the translations) of Sudan. Gradually the two Lands were assimilated into one, Ta Khent (“The Land of the Beginning”). The physical difference between the ANU and the MESNITU is noted in the jaws, those of the ANU being more rounded and short while those of the MESNITU are square like that of Narmer-Menes. But there are also sub-groups inside these two groups like the Beja (among the MESNITU) and the Rekhytu people in the north (who would have arrived in the Nile valley by Coptos) and groups supporting or mixing to UNAs from Sinai and Libya.
The story is complex because you still have other groups from different origins: the AAMU of Asian style but dressed like Egyptians and living in the mountains of Egypt, the NEHESY living beyond present-day Sudan, the TEMEHU of the desert of West, Libya and the northern coasts of Egypt. All these people were not simple hunters and simple aborigines as some think; they had great knowledge and great organization - but then where did their knowledge come from in such ancient times?
First let's examine what tangibly exists: the human fragments accompanied by signs of civilization, the oldest that archeology has found recently in Egypt (but we risk finding the next few months even much older), were found at 250km south of Aswan to Qadan, in elaborate burials with rituals that would officially date between 13.000 to 9.000 BC. It is a proven fact, they were not simple aborigines, they had tools, knowledge in agriculture, complex rituals. Even if this is not yet the high sophistication that we are looking for, note already that they were much older than the Sumerians and even the earlier Ubaydians. It is time for people to realize that civilization on Earth may not have started in Sumer (19th century claim imposed by biblical movements!); it is much more complex than that and the evidence is pouring in more and more everywhere.
I can not help but point out the discovery the 7 May 2009 in a mountain cave near Denderah in southern Egypt by a Belgian team, a skeleton that would date between 30.000 and 33.000 years. But there is better, his skull was turned east and found pottery around him attesting in any case a certain level of culture.
A mysterious people with large skulls
But let's go back to looking for our group of people with very high knowledge who was apparently much more advanced than others in terms of true civilization, and who disappeared to 4000 years before JC in Egypt.
Professor Walter B. Emery (1903-71), the excellent archaeologist and author of the famous book Archaic Egypt, which excava many Saqqara and more than 45 years in Egypt, found in graves, remains of people who lived at predynastic times north of Upper Egypt.
However, the characteristics of these bodies and skeletons are incredible. The skulls are of an unusual volume, they are dolichocephalic, that is to say that the cranial box, seen by its upper part, is oval, the greatest length outweighing about a quarter over the greatest width, and sometimes the usual sutures are absent. The skeletons are larger than the average for the area and above all the framework is wider and heavier. He did not hesitate to assimilate them to the "Followers of Horus" and found that during their lifetime they fulfilled an important priestly role.
However, as regards the dolichocephali, it seems that this is not a line of prehistoric evolution but rather a line coming from a cycle of civilization prior to the flood. In fact, these dolichocephalic skulls have already been found in several regions of the world. Thus Dr J. Von
Tschudi and Mariano E. Rivero in Peru have enumerated three pre-Inca dolichocephalic races: the Chinchas, Aymaras and Huancas. The researchers also found that if the Chinchas had elongated skulls, it was because they bandaged the skulls of their children in order to resemble the two other groups who did not practice skull bandage. It has been determined that the original group with the strongest and most natural characteristics is that of the Chinchas. They would have predated the first Inca MancoCapac and would have influenced both the Incas and the Mayans later. And researcher AH Verrill and Posnansky point out that the oldest pre-Inca city in Peru is Tiahuanaco (the same age as predynastic Egypt), and dolichocephalic skulls from this period can be found in the Tihuanaco Museum. It is therefore affirmed that there was a pre-diluvian race that we find everywhere on the globe and which had the conical skull lengthened in a natural way, as affirmed by some researchers including Dr. Tschudi who demonstrates it because he has a 7 month old fetus with a dolichocephalic skull still in the womb of its fossilized mother from that time.
All of this is far from "politically correct" as it challenges genetics, evolutionary history and biblical beliefs, so people are only slowly absorbing this exciting new data. As a demonstration, the fact that the dolichocephalic skulls of the Museum of Valletta in Malta are removed from public view, no doubt so as not to shock the religious mentalities of some. In fact, in Malta about 700 dolichocephalic skulls were found in the hypogeums of Hal Saflieni and in the tombs of the megalithic temples of Taxian, Ggantja. There it was Dr Anton Mifsud and Dr Charles Savona Ventura who analyzed the skulls and came to the same conclusion as in Peru by arriving to discern three different groups, some completely "natural" in origin, others having suffered bandages.
Now there is an even closer link with Egypt. The ancient name of Malta (Malta) is Melita, from the Latin name for honey mel, and the symbol of Malta is a bee with its hexagonal ray cells. Let us not forget that the symbol of pharaoh in Egypt is also the bee ("Bit") which gives it one of its titles, that honey was reserved for Pharaoh and the high priests and that Mel (or Mer) was one of the names attributed in Egypt to the pyramids. On the other hand, solar worship predominated in Malta as in Egypt. However, the dolichocephalic caste disappeared at the same time in Malta and Egypt. In my own research I note that moreover there would undoubtedly have been a migration from Egypt to Malta of these dolichocephalic beings and we also find traces of them in Cretan civilization. Be that as it may, this race which apparently was consecrated to the priesthood and to teaching and which mixed very little or very slowly, had as a common point everywhere that of building megalithic monuments and forming a dominant priestly caste wherever she was. Would these people be the remains of an ante-diluvian race, perhaps, but these are the famous Shemsu-Hor, not sure.
Shemsu-Hor according to the Egyptian oral tradition
Indeed, what does the oral tradition say, still alive among certain Egyptians today, initiated from generation to generation? Well, that the term Shemsu-Hor would have been very poorly translated. The designation of "Followers of Horus" is not convincing. For them the word is first of all "Seshu-Hor" and in very ancient Egyptian means "the evolved principle of man". The word “Zep Tepi” that the famous Robert Beauval and Graham Hancock translated into “First Time” would be for them (and also for the English Egyptologist EA Raymond) to be translated as “When the gods manifested themselves as humans” . The exact phrase that we find on the walls of the temple of Edfu is "Ntr ntri hpr m sp tpy" that is to say "The sanctified god who came to be born at the first opportunity".
The passers of the oral tradition say that these words therefore refer to a time when the divine manifested in humans to raise their consciousness because they say, the humans of that time in Egypt, the Shesh people (hence Sheshu- Hor), organized into 42 tribes (which later became the 42 Nomes or regions) was beginning to lose its meaning. Indeed if today we have our five senses, for the smugglers at that time we had 365! We really lost a lot! And so the divine manifested itself more and more at this time to try to stop already the degradation and loss of the senses of the Shesh and to try to preserve communion with the 360 Neters (improperly translated according to them, in "gods"), that is to say “the 360 Principles of divine creation”. So we have originally, this Shesh people made up of 42 tribes (including the Anu) from different origins having united and having had prestigious ancestors like Anubis, Osiris, etc ..., and a mysterious dolichocephalic race of which we do not know almost nothing.