LPhysicists have forgotten all about the observer effect. They are content with their elegant equations and await the discovery of some additional dimensions beyond those that humans perceive, or the formulation of the unified theory of everything which they hope will manage to synthesize all these contradictory discoveries. into a single central theory.
Thirty years ago, while the rest of the scientific community mechanically pursued their work without trying to understand, a small band of pioneering scientists from prestigious universities around the world stopped to examine the metaphysical implications of the Copenhagen interpretation and the effect of the observer.
If matter is mutable, and it is consciousness that makes it adopt any form, then it seems likely that consciousness is also capable of leading things to take a particular direction.
Their investigations ended up being a simple question:
If directing one's attention to something changes the physical matter, what can be the effect of the intention? What happens if we deliberately try to bring about change? In our participation as observers of the quantum world, we are perhaps not only creators, but also influencers.
These scientists undertook to design and conduct experiments to test what they called "remote-directed mental influence" or "psychokinesis", or, more simply, "the intention" or even "intentionality".
In a classical definition of intention, the latter would be characterized as "A deliberate plan to accomplish an action, which will lead to the desired resultUnlike a desire, which simply means that we want a certain result, without having formulated a precise plan to achieve it.
An intention is directed to the actions of the very one who expresses it; it requires a form of reasoning, as well as a commitment to do the right thing. An intention implies that there is a purpose and that we understand the need for an action plan to achieve the intended result.
Marilyn Schlitz, vice president of research and education at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, and one of the scientists involved in the first-ever investigations of remote influence, defined the intention as "the projection of consciousness, deliberately and effectively, to achieve a given goal or result ". To influence the physical matter, they believed, the experimenter had to be extremely motivated, and his thought, very focused.
In a series of remarkable experiments, these scientists demonstrated that having certain directed thoughts could have an effect on the body, on inanimate objects, and on almost all kinds of living things, from unicellular organisms to humans.
Two of the main figures in this tiny subgroup were Robert Jahn, former Dean of Engineering at Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Laboratory (PEAR) at Princeton University, and his colleague Brenda Dunne, who had co-created a research program. research developed based on sound science.
For twenty-five years, Jahn and Dunne led what became a huge international effort to quantify what is called "micro psychokinesis," the effect of the mind on random number generators that execute the electronic equivalent of a coin shot.
The data produced by these machines (batteries and computer faces) were controlled by positive and negative pulses alternating at random. Since their activity was totally random, they generated a more or less equal number of stacks and faces, according to the laws of probability.
The most frequent configuration of the experiments carried out with these generators was that of two attractive images alternating on the screen of a computer (for example), cowboys and Indians.
Participants in these studies were placed in front of the computers, and asked to try to influence the machines to give one of two images more often (say, more cowboys), and then to focus their thoughts in order to get more pictures of Indians, and then they had to try not to sway the machines one way or the other.
After more than two and a half million experimental trials, Jahn and Dunne decisively demonstrated that human intention can influence these electronic devices in the specified direction, and their results were independently reproduced by 68 other researchers.
While the PEAR lab concentrated its research on the effect of the mind on processes and inanimate objects, many other scientists were experimenting with the effect of human intention on living things.
Most of the first discoveries on consciousness occurred more than thirty years ago. More recent discoveries in quantum physics as well as in several labs around the globe offer answers to some of these questions. They provide evidence that our world is extremely malleable and open to a constant, subtle influence.
Recent research shows that living things continually transmit and receive measurable energy.
New theoretical models of consciousness present it as an entity capable of encroaching on all types of physical boundaries. The intention seems to be something analogous to a tuning fork, making the tuning fork of the other things in the universe sound at the same frequency.
The most recent studies of the effect of the mind on matter seem to indicate that intention has variable effects depending on the state of the subject, as well as when he utters a thought and where he is located.
The intention has already been used in many areas, including curing diseases, modifying physical processes, and influencing events. It is not a special gift but a skill learned and easily taught.
In reality, we all already use the intention in many aspects of our daily lives.
All of the research carried out also suggests that the power of intention is multiplied according to the number of people simultaneously thinking the same thing...
Lynn Mc Taggart
Biology of beliefs - How to free the power of consciousness, matter and miracles - 10th anniversary edition revised and increased.
🛒 I order mine 👇
Release Date | 2016-09-03T00:00:01Z |
Language | Français |
Number Of Pages | 306 |
Publication Date | 2016-09-03T00:00:01Z |
Format | large format book |